After watching The Zookeeper's Wife and being reminded of my current fiction book, All the Light We Cannot See, I decided to write my first blog post as a literary criticism on how they provide support for each another. Thanks for reading!
The Zookeeper’s Wife as a Form of Support to All the Light We
Cannot See
During
the course of World War II, there are many incredible perspectives that are
unable to be explored throughout the course of a single novel. However,
after recently reading about and watching videos on the war, I discovered that
various forms of media were able to explore and properly display these points
of view. The novel All the Light We Cannot See by Anthony Doerr,
and the film The Zookeeper’s Wife contrast and support each other in a
way that they would be unable to individually. Interestingly, both are
able to remain similar although the book is fictional and the movie tells a
true story.
All
the Light We Cannot See occurs mostly between 1940 and 1944, but by halfway
through the book, it has included several flashbacks to the characters’
childhood before the war began. Instead of focusing primarily on the
history of the war and what is occurring around the world, the novel follows
two characters and their journeys on opposing sides. One, a French, blind,
teenage girl, and the other a German teenage boy. It is largely anecdotal
in nature and includes mostly narrative and descriptive elements of writing.
By doing this, Doerr is able to focus on imagery and character
development, as opposed to historical accuracy. One fascinating aspect of
the novel, however, is the characters’ point-of-view of the war as teenagers.
For example, Marie-Laure often feels alone because of her loss of sight,
and then her father’s absence when he is held prisoner. The teenage boy,
Werner Pfenning, is an orphan, and is recruited by the Germans to track down
the resistance, which he feels morally conflicted about and must go through
alone. The novel follows both characters
as the war progresses and shows the struggles that they face when separated
from their loved ones.
On
the other hand, The Zookeeper’s Wife is anecdotal by nature, but remains
focused primarily on historical accuracy. The movie occurs largely
between 1939 and 1944, but has one scene from post-war 1949. The
Zookeeper’s Wife follows the story of zookeepers Antonina and Jan Zabinski,
who saved hundreds of people and animals during the German invasion. It
specifically focuses on one family, but the viewer is able to witness many
different people and hear their stories as they pass through the Zabinski house
on their way to safety. Being a true story, the movie incorporates
multiple graphic scenes, which sometimes distract from the purpose of the film.
While both the novel and the film provide a
civilian's perspective, they are still dramatically different. The movie,
for example, shows close-up the harsh realities of the German soldiers, whose
cruelty had no limits, and the devastation they caused over a considerable
period of time, while the novel focused on the characters and imagery of the
time. In The Zookeeper’s Wife, Lutz Heck (played by Daniel Bruhl),
is a German zoologist who is exceptionally vicious, both towards humans and
animals. In one scene, he attempts to assault Antonina after refusing to
help her locate her wounded husband. Knowing that this is a true story
makes it especially traumatic for the viewer, but halfway through the novel, All
the Light We Cannot See still does not have any scenes that are especially
brutal. Most passages are filled with descriptive imagery, like when
Doerr states, “Cold, sumptuous silk onto which the sea has laid offerings:
pebbles, shells, barnacles. Tiny slips of wrack” (Doerr 232). This makes
for an interesting novel, but doesn’t fully provide insight into different
historical events during World War II.
After
both watching the movie and reading the book, the reader is able to fully
experience the different aspects of the war because of the various perspectives
seen in each. Doerr provides an anecdotal account of the war, which
allows the reader to experience the war as a typical civilian would have, while
the film provides historical context.
Combined, the two perfectly contrast and support each other in a way that
they would be unable to individually.


Fun! I thoroughly enjoyed how you took it upon yourself to actually compare these two stories- I haven't seen either but your analysis and comparisons definitely sparked my interest. You drew some interesting thoughts while also addressing similarities and differences, such as when you pointed out the contrasts of brutality in the book and movie.
ReplyDeleteI also appreciate how each piece uses the perspective of a civilian, while still making it interesting and unique.
The imagery mentioned in All The Light We Cannot See was also intriguing- your points tie in well to our lesson on imagery and the effects of excessive imagery. It was fun to see you study a book and movie. Nicely done! I'm proud.
Glad you enjoyed the post, Ellie :). I'd really recommend checking out both the book and the movie!
Delete